Effects of Fasting on 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Prostate Cancer Lesions and Tissues with Known High Physiologic Uptake.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2018;59(7):1081-1084
Full text from:

Plain language summary

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (PSMA is a type II membrane protein)–targeted PET imaging is being increasingly applied in prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of fasting on 18F-DCFPyL (is a fluorine-18 labelled ligand binding specifically to PSMA) uptake in organs with known high physiologic uptake and in lesions characteristic of prostate cancer metastases. The study is a cohort study in which 50 and 48 patients were analysed in the fasting and non-fasting cohorts, respectively. Results showed that lesions characteristic of prostate cancer showed similar uptake in both the fasting and the non-fasting cohorts (number of lesions characteristic of prostate cancer totalled to 152 and 131 respectively). Authors conclude that fasting for up to 6 h before 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT does not significantly affect uptake in suspected malignant lesions but significantly lowers uptake in tissues with high physiologic uptake, such as the salivary glands, liver, and spleen.

Abstract

In the literature, a 4- to 6-h fast is recommended before a patient undergoes PET/CT with 2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-[(6-18F-fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl)-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (18F-DCFPyL); however, a scientific underpinning for this recommendation is lacking. Therefore, we performed a study to determine the impact of fasting on 18F-DCFPyL uptake. Methods: The study included 50 patients who fasted at least 6 h before 18F-DCFPyL administration and 50 patients who did not. Activity (SUVmax) was measured in lesions characteristic of prostate cancer and in normal tissues known to express high physiologic uptake. Results: Uptake in suspected lesions did not differ between the cohorts. 18F-DCFPyL uptake in the submandibular gland, liver, and spleen was significantly higher in the fasting than the nonfasting cohort. Conclusion: Our data show that fasting does not significantly affect 18F-DCFPyL uptake in suspected malignant lesions but does result in significantly lower 18F-DCFPyL uptake in tissues with high physiologic uptake. The absolute differences in uptake were relatively small; therefore, the effects of fasting on the diagnostic performance can be considered negligible.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Immune and inflammation
Patient Centred Factors : Triggers/Fasting
Environmental Inputs : Nutrients
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition
Functional Laboratory Testing : Imaging

Methodological quality

Allocation concealment : Not applicable
Publication Type : Clinical Trial ; Journal Article

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : Prostate cancer ; Adipose tissue ; Fasting